Study guides

Q: Is 218 divisible by 3

Write your answer...

Submit

Related questions

218 is NOT divisible by 5 so the question, as stated, makes no sense.

218 is divisible by 1, 2, 109, 218

No. 436 is only divisible by: 1, 2, 4, 109, 218, 436.

no, 218 divided by 9 is 24.222

No.

All multiples of 218 (which are infinite) including 218, 436, 654, 872, 1090 . . .

Yes, any number is divisible by any other number

All Factors of 218:1, 2, 109, 218

No. If the sum of (the hundreds digit times 4) plus (the tens digit times 2) plus (the ones digit [times 1]) is divisible by 8, then so is the original number: 2 x 4 + 1 x 2 + 8 x 1 = 18 which is not divisible by 8, so 218 is not divisible by 8.

1, 2, 41, 82, 109, 218, 4469, 8938

As an even number greater than 2, 218 is divisible by 2 and therefore composite. Its positive integer factors are: 1, 2, 109, 218

Yes, but not with a whole number answer, the answers would be 0.000929364067716 and 21.8

It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.

1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 109, 218, 436, 872, 1744.

All numbers divisible by 3 are NOT divisible by 9. As an example, 6, which is divisible by 3, is not divisible by 9. However, all numbers divisible by 9 are also divisible by 3 because 9 is divisible by 3.

No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.

If x is an integer divisible by 3, is x squared divisible by 3?

Converse:If a number is divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is divisible by three. Inverse: If every digit of a number is not divisible by 3 then the number is not divisible by 3? Contrapositive:If a number is not divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is not divisible by three.

1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 109, 218, 436, 872, 1744.

No, it is not evenly divisible by 3. The answer you get is 6,665.3333. A trick to tell is a number is divisible by 3 is to add up the digits and see if they are divisible by 3. In this case, 34 is not divisible by 3.

To determine if a number is divisible by 3, add all the digits. If the sum is divisible by 3, so is the number. 8+4+3+5 = 20, which is not divisible by 3 (not a multiple of 3). So, 8435 is not divisible by 3.

Add up the digits of the number. If the sum is divisible by 3, then the number itself is divisible by 3. Ex: Is 781 divisible by 3? 7+8+1=16 16 is not divisible by 3 so neither is 781 Is 903 divisible by 3? 9+0+3= 12 12 is divisible by 3 so 903 is divisible by 3

If this is a T-F question, the answer is false. It is true that if a number is divisible by 6, it also divisible by 3. This is true because 6 is divisible by 3. However, the converse -- If a number is divisible by 3, it is divisible by 6, is false. A counterexample is 15. 15 is divisible by 3, but not by 6. It becomes clearer if you split the question into its two parts. A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 3? False. It must also be divisible by 2. A number is divisible by 6 only if it is divisible by 3? True.

1x6,743 not divisible by 2 no its not divisible by 3????

Because 9 is divisible by 3, this is like the rule where if a number is divisible by 2 and 3 it is also divisible by 6.